UPDATED: 09-08-25 10:43 PDT

men LIU 1
  
LIU                   
W-L: ( 9- 4) PR = 91.2533

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 204 A Rutgers B1G ( 7- 9, 95.0) 3-17 208 A Mt St Marys MAAC ( 4-10, 88.6) 15-12 215 H Iona MAAC ( 2-13, 86.5) 14- 9 222 H Siena MAAC (11- 4, 94.1) 13-12 301 H Bellarmine ASUN ( 8- 9, 89.8) 15- 9 308 A Queens ASUN ( 3-11, 87.6) 13- 9 315 A Mercyhurst NEC ( 2-11, 86.4) 15-12 322 H Detroit NEC ( 5- 6, 88.3) 14- 9 328 A Wagner NEC ( 1-13, 85.7) 11-12 405 H Rob Morris NEC ( 9- 5, 91.8) 9-13 412 A Cleveland St NEC ( 4-10, 88.3) 15- 7 419 H Le Moyne NEC ( 9- 5, 89.7) 13- 6 426 A VMI NEC (10- 4, 90.6) 12-15

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   204 A Rutgers                 3-17     -14    -5          -0.43
   208 A Mt St Marys            15-12       3     2           1.22
   215 H Iona                   14- 9       5     6           0.00
   222 H Siena                  13-12       1    -2    +      2.95
   301 H Bellarmine             15- 9       6     2    +      2.67
   308 A Queens                 13- 9       4     3           1.25
   315 A Mercyhurst             15-12       3     4          -0.96
   322 H Detroit                14- 9       5     4           1.22
   328 A Wagner                 11-12      -1     5    --    -5.68
   405 H Rob Morris              9-13      -4     0    --    -4.31
   412 A Cleveland St           15- 7       8     2    +      2.94
   419 H Le Moyne               13- 6       7     2    +      2.60
   426 A VMI                    12-15      -3     0    -     -2.81

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   328 A Wagner                 11-12      -1     5    --    -5.68
   405 H Rob Morris              9-13      -4     0    --    -4.31
   426 A VMI                    12-15      -3     0    -     -2.81

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   222 H Siena                  13-12       1    -2    +      2.95
   301 H Bellarmine             15- 9       6     2    +      2.67
   412 A Cleveland St           15- 7       8     2    +      2.94
   419 H Le Moyne               13- 6       7     2    +      2.60

LIU Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Air Force Air Force tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Air Force
Albany Albany   Albany
Army Army insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Army
Bellarmine LIU LIU  
Binghamton LIU insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) LIU
Boston Univ Boston Univ tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Boston Univ
Brown Brown   Brown
Bryant Bryant   Bryant
Bucknell Bucknell tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Bucknell
Canisius LIU LIU   6- 1 vs 2- 5
Cleveland St LIU LIU  
Colgate Colgate   Colgate
Cornell Cornell   Cornell
Dartmouth Dartmouth tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Dartmouth
Delaware Delaware   Delaware
Denver Denver   Denver
Detroit LIU LIU  
Drexel Drexel   Drexel
Duke Duke tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Duke
Fairfield Fairfield   Fairfield
Georgetown Georgetown   Georgetown
Hampton LIU LIU   5- 1 vs 0- 6
Harvard Harvard   Harvard
High Point High Point High Point   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Hobart Hobart tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Hobart
Hofstra Hofstra tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) Hofstra
Holy Cross LIU tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) LIU
Iona LIU LIU  
Jacksonville Jacksonville tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) Jacksonville
JHU JHU tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) JHU
Lafayette Lafayette tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Lafayette
Le Moyne LIU LIU  
Lehigh Lehigh tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Lehigh
Loyola Loyola tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Loyola
Manhattan LIU tied - ( 3- 1) ( 3- 1) LIU
Marist Marist insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) Marist
Marquette Marquette tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) Marquette
Maryland Maryland tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Maryland
UMass UMass insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) UMass
Mass-Lowell LIU tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) LIU
Mercer LIU LIU   3- 1 vs 1- 3
Mercyhurst LIU LIU  
Merrimack LIU LIU   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Michigan Michigan insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Michigan
Monmouth LIU insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) LIU
Mt St Marys LIU LIU  
Navy Navy tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Navy
NJIT LIU insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) LIU
No Carolina No Carolina   No Carolina
Notre Dame Notre Dame tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Notre Dame
Ohio State Ohio State insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 4- 0) Ohio State
Penn Penn   Penn
Penn State Penn State Penn State   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Princeton Princeton insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Princeton
Providence Providence   Providence
Queens LIU LIU  
Quinnipiac LIU LIU   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Richmond Richmond insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Richmond
Rob Morris Rob Morris Rob Morris  
Rutgers Rutgers Rutgers  
Sacred Heart Sacred Heart insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 4- 0) Sacred Heart
Siena LIU LIU  
St B'venture LIU LIU   5- 2 vs 3- 4
St Johns LIU tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) LIU
St Josephs St Josephs insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) St Josephs
Stony Brook Stony Brook insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) Stony Brook
Syracuse Syracuse   Syracuse
Towson Towson   Towson
UMBC UMBC tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) UMBC
Utah Utah tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Utah
Vermont Vermont   Vermont
Villanova Villanova   Villanova
Virginia Virginia   Virginia
VMI VMI VMI  
Wagner Wagner Wagner  
Yale Yale   Yale

PowerWise = 22


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 14.34

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Rutgers         ( 7- 9, 95.0)     3-17       -4.93      13.88       0.86         1.10            -4.50
   0 A Mt St Marys     ( 4-10, 88.6)    15-12      -11.29       7.53       0.86         1.10             9.25
   0 H Iona            ( 2-13, 86.5)    14- 9      -13.45       5.36      -0.86         1.10             4.97
   0 H Siena           (11- 4, 94.1)    13-12       -5.83      12.98      -0.86         1.10            13.37
   0 H Bellarmine      ( 8- 9, 89.8)    15- 9      -10.12       8.70      -0.86         1.10             8.64
   0 A Queens          ( 3-11, 87.6)    13- 9      -12.26       6.56       0.86         1.10             8.18
   0 A Mercyhurst      ( 2-11, 86.4)    15-12      -13.46       5.35       0.86         1.10             6.85
   0 H Detroit         ( 5- 6, 88.3)    14- 9      -11.57       7.24      -0.86         1.10             7.04
   0 A Wagner          ( 1-13, 85.7)    11-12      -14.18       4.63       0.86         1.10           -14.70
   0 H Rob Morris      ( 9- 5, 91.8)     9-13       -8.10      10.72      -0.86         1.10            -9.88
   0 A Cleveland St    ( 4-10, 88.3)    15- 7      -11.56       7.25       0.86         1.10             8.94
   0 H Le Moyne        ( 9- 5, 89.7)    13- 6      -10.19       8.62      -0.86         1.10             8.56
   0 A VMI             (10- 4, 90.6)    12-15       -9.32       9.49       0.86         1.10            -9.33
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        37.40

winning pts = 75.8018 losing points = -38.4002

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------