LIU 
W-L: ( 9- 4) PR = 91.2533
Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score
204 A Rutgers B1G ( 7- 9, 95.0) 3-17
208 A Mt St Marys MAAC ( 4-10, 88.6) 15-12
215 H Iona MAAC ( 2-13, 86.5) 14- 9
222 H Siena MAAC (11- 4, 94.1) 13-12
301 H Bellarmine ASUN ( 8- 9, 89.8) 15- 9
308 A Queens ASUN ( 3-11, 87.6) 13- 9
315 A Mercyhurst NEC ( 2-11, 86.4) 15-12
322 H Detroit NEC ( 5- 6, 88.3) 14- 9
328 A Wagner NEC ( 1-13, 85.7) 11-12
405 H Rob Morris NEC ( 9- 5, 91.8) 9-13
412 A Cleveland St NEC ( 4-10, 88.3) 15- 7
419 H Le Moyne NEC ( 9- 5, 89.7) 13- 6
426 A VMI NEC (10- 4, 90.6) 12-15
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
204 A Rutgers 3-17 -14 -5 -0.43
208 A Mt St Marys 15-12 3 2 1.22
215 H Iona 14- 9 5 6 0.00
222 H Siena 13-12 1 -2 + 2.95
301 H Bellarmine 15- 9 6 2 + 2.67
308 A Queens 13- 9 4 3 1.25
315 A Mercyhurst 15-12 3 4 -0.96
322 H Detroit 14- 9 5 4 1.22
328 A Wagner 11-12 -1 5 -- -5.68
405 H Rob Morris 9-13 -4 0 -- -4.31
412 A Cleveland St 15- 7 8 2 + 2.94
419 H Le Moyne 13- 6 7 2 + 2.60
426 A VMI 12-15 -3 0 - -2.81
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
328 A Wagner 11-12 -1 5 -- -5.68
405 H Rob Morris 9-13 -4 0 -- -4.31
426 A VMI 12-15 -3 0 - -2.81
|
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
222 H Siena 13-12 1 -2 + 2.95
301 H Bellarmine 15- 9 6 2 + 2.67
412 A Cleveland St 15- 7 8 2 + 2.94
419 H Le Moyne 13- 6 7 2 + 2.60
|
LIU Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent |
Who Gets the Point?
| Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
Air Force |
Air Force |
|
tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) |
Air Force |
Albany |
Albany |
|
 
| Albany |
Army |
Army |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Army |
Bellarmine |
LIU |
LIU |
 
| |
Binghamton |
LIU |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
LIU |
Boston Univ |
Boston Univ |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Boston Univ |
Brown |
Brown |
|
 
| Brown |
Bryant |
Bryant |
|
 
| Bryant |
Bucknell |
Bucknell |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Bucknell |
Canisius |
LIU |
|
LIU   6- 1 vs 2- 5 |
|
Cleveland St |
LIU |
LIU |
 
| |
Colgate |
Colgate |
|
 
| Colgate |
Cornell |
Cornell |
|
 
| Cornell |
Dartmouth |
Dartmouth |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Dartmouth |
Delaware |
Delaware |
|
 
| Delaware |
Denver |
Denver |
|
 
| Denver |
Detroit |
LIU |
LIU |
 
| |
Drexel |
Drexel |
|
 
| Drexel |
Duke |
Duke |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Duke |
Fairfield |
Fairfield |
|
 
| Fairfield |
Georgetown |
Georgetown |
|
 
| Georgetown |
Hampton |
LIU |
|
LIU   5- 1 vs 0- 6 |
|
Harvard |
Harvard |
|
 
| Harvard |
High Point |
High Point |
|
High Point   3- 0 vs 1- 2 |
|
Hobart |
Hobart |
|
tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) |
Hobart |
Hofstra |
Hofstra |
|
tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) |
Hofstra |
Holy Cross |
LIU |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
LIU |
Iona |
LIU |
LIU |
 
| |
Jacksonville |
Jacksonville |
|
tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) |
Jacksonville |
JHU |
JHU |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
JHU |
Lafayette |
Lafayette |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Lafayette |
Le Moyne |
LIU |
LIU |
 
|
Lehigh |
Lehigh |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Lehigh |
Loyola |
Loyola |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Loyola |
Manhattan |
LIU |
|
tied - ( 3- 1) ( 3- 1) |
LIU |
Marist |
Marist |
|
insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) |
Marist |
Marquette |
Marquette |
|
tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) |
Marquette |
Maryland |
Maryland |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Maryland |
UMass |
UMass |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
UMass |
Mass-Lowell |
LIU |
|
tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) |
LIU |
Mercer |
LIU |
|
LIU   3- 1 vs 1- 3 |
|
Mercyhurst |
LIU |
LIU |
 
| |
Merrimack |
LIU |
|
LIU   3- 0 vs 1- 2 |
|
Michigan |
Michigan |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) |
Michigan |
Monmouth |
LIU |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) |
LIU |
Mt St Marys |
LIU |
LIU |
 
| |
Navy |
Navy |
|
tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) |
Navy |
NJIT |
LIU |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
LIU |
No Carolina |
No Carolina |
|
 
| No Carolina |
Notre Dame |
Notre Dame |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Notre Dame |
Ohio State |
Ohio State |
|
insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 4- 0) |
Ohio State |
Penn |
Penn |
|
 
| Penn |
Penn State |
Penn State |
|
Penn State   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
Princeton |
Princeton |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Princeton |
Providence |
Providence |
|
 
| Providence |
Queens |
LIU |
LIU |
 
| |
Quinnipiac |
LIU |
|
LIU   3- 0 vs 1- 2 |
|
Richmond |
Richmond |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) |
Richmond |
Rob Morris |
Rob Morris |
Rob Morris |
 
| |
Rutgers |
Rutgers |
Rutgers |
 
| |
Sacred Heart |
Sacred Heart |
|
insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 4- 0) |
Sacred Heart |
Siena |
LIU |
LIU |
 
| |
St B'venture |
LIU |
|
LIU   5- 2 vs 3- 4 |
|
St Johns |
LIU |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
LIU |
St Josephs |
St Josephs |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
St Josephs |
Stony Brook |
Stony Brook |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) |
Stony Brook |
Syracuse |
Syracuse |
|
 
| Syracuse |
Towson |
Towson |
|
 
| Towson |
UMBC |
UMBC |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
UMBC |
Utah |
Utah |
|
tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) |
Utah |
Vermont |
Vermont |
|
 
| Vermont |
Villanova |
Villanova |
|
 
| Villanova |
Virginia |
Virginia |
|
 
| Virginia |
VMI |
VMI |
VMI |
 
| |
Wagner |
Wagner |
Wagner |
 
|
Yale |
Yale |
|
 
| Yale |
PowerWise = 22

division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 14.34
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Rutgers ( 7- 9, 95.0) 3-17 -4.93 13.88 0.86 1.10 -4.50
0 A Mt St Marys ( 4-10, 88.6) 15-12 -11.29 7.53 0.86 1.10 9.25
0 H Iona ( 2-13, 86.5) 14- 9 -13.45 5.36 -0.86 1.10 4.97
0 H Siena (11- 4, 94.1) 13-12 -5.83 12.98 -0.86 1.10 13.37
0 H Bellarmine ( 8- 9, 89.8) 15- 9 -10.12 8.70 -0.86 1.10 8.64
0 A Queens ( 3-11, 87.6) 13- 9 -12.26 6.56 0.86 1.10 8.18
0 A Mercyhurst ( 2-11, 86.4) 15-12 -13.46 5.35 0.86 1.10 6.85
0 H Detroit ( 5- 6, 88.3) 14- 9 -11.57 7.24 -0.86 1.10 7.04
0 A Wagner ( 1-13, 85.7) 11-12 -14.18 4.63 0.86 1.10 -14.70
0 H Rob Morris ( 9- 5, 91.8) 9-13 -8.10 10.72 -0.86 1.10 -9.88
0 A Cleveland St ( 4-10, 88.3) 15- 7 -11.56 7.25 0.86 1.10 8.94
0 H Le Moyne ( 9- 5, 89.7) 13- 6 -10.19 8.62 -0.86 1.10 8.56
0 A VMI (10- 4, 90.6) 12-15 -9.32 9.49 0.86 1.10 -9.33
------
37.40
|
winning pts = 75.8018 losing points = -38.4002
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------